Mendoza v. Cate

Filing 41

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/14/12 ORDERING that on or before October 15, 2012, petitioner may file a motion to expand the record or any other motion he deems appropriate in order to proceed with this action; Respondent s hall file an opposition to petitioners motion on or before November 15, 2012. Petitioner may file a reply to respondents opposition on or before December 3, 2012 A hearing on petitioners motion filed pursuant to this order shall he held on December 7, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom #27.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARQUIMEDES MENDOZA, Petitioner, 11 vs. 12 13 No. CIV S-09-1710 MCE DAD P MATTHEW CATE, Respondent. 14 ORDER / 15 A status conference was held in this matter at 10:00 a.m. on September 14, 2012, 16 17 in the courtroom of the undersigned. Michael Bigelow appeared for petitioner. Justain Riley 18 appeared for respondent. After discussion with counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS 19 HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. On or before October 15, 2012, petitioner may file a motion to expand the 20 21 record or any other motion he deems appropriate in order to proceed with this action; 2. Respondent shall file an opposition to petitioner’s motion on or before 22 23 November 15, 2012. 3. Petitioner may file a reply to respondent’s opposition on or before December 3, 24 25 2012. 26 ///// 1 1 4. A hearing on petitioner’s motion filed pursuant to this order shall he held on 2 December 7, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom #27. 3 DATED: September 14, 2012. 4 5 6 7 DAD:8 mendoza1710.oah 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?