Mendoza v. Cate

Filing 45

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/19/2012 ORDERING that on or before 12/17/2012, petitioner may file a motion to expand the record or any other motion he deems appropriate in order to proceed in this action; respondent shall file a n opposition to petitioner's motion, if any, on or before 1/17/2013; petitioner may file a reply to respondent's opposition or or before 1/31/2013; the 1/11/2013 hearing is VACATED; a hearing on petitioner's motion filed pursuant to this order will now be held 2/8/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd.) (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARQUIMEDES MENDOZA, Petitioner, 11 vs. 12 13 No. 2:09-cv-1710 MCE DAD P MATTHEW CATE, Respondent. 14 ORDER / 15 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a petition for a writ 16 17 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On November 15, 2012, petitioner filed a 18 request to modify the briefing schedule in this habeas action set forth in this court’s order dated 19 October 18, 2012. Good cause appearing, that request will be granted. 20 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 21 1. On or before December 17, 2012, petitioner may file a motion to expand the 22 record or any other motion he deems appropriate in order to proceed with this action; 2. Respondent shall file an opposition to petitioner’s motion, if any, on or before 23 24 January 17, 2013; 3. Petitioner may file a reply to respondent’s opposition on or before January 31, 25 26 2013. 1 1 4. The hearing currently scheduled for January 11, 2013 is vacated. 2 5. A hearing on petitioner’s motion filed pursuant to this order will now be held 3 on February 8, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom #27. 4 DATED: November 19, 2012. 5 6 7 8 DAD:8 mendoza1710.vac 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?