Ferraro v. State of California et al

Filing 16

ORDER and SCHEDULING ORDER: signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 09/10/09 ordering within 10 days from the date of this order, counsel shall send a letter to the court addressing whether the 10/08/09 hearing on the motion to dismiss is necess ary in light of the filing of the 09/09/09 second amended complaint. Rule 26 initial disclosure shall be stayed until June 2010, following closing of the pleadings. Further status conference is set for 04/01/10 at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom 26 before t he undersigned. Non-expert discovery shall be completed and all motions pertaining to discovery shall be noticed and hear by 11/21/10. Expert Discovery due by 12/21/2010. Rebuttal expert discovery shall be completed by 02/21/11. Dispositive Motion s due by 4/7/2011, Pretrial Conference set for 5/26/2011 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 26 before Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds. Jury Trial set for 8/23/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr... (Plummer, M) Modified on 9/11/2009 (Plummer, M).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. / A status conference was held in this matter on September 10, 2009, at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom #26. Jeremiah J. House and Rudy M.A. Cosio appeared for plaintiffs. Samantha H. Ramsey, Deputy Attorney General, appeared for defendants Tilton, Trimble, Schnitzler, Cho, Evans and Ewing. Upon consideration of the August 18, 2009 motion to dismiss, the joint status report on file in this action, the September 9, 2009 Second Amended Complaint, discussion of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 1. Within ten days from the date of this order, counsel shall send a letter to the court addressing whether the October 8, 2009 hearing on the motion to dismiss is necessary in light of the filing of the September 9, 2009 second amended complaint. Said letter may be jointly filed by both counsel, or shall be filed by one counsel with the express authority of the other counsel, with a copy to the other counsel noted thereon. ///// 1 ORDER AND SCHEDULING ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MERCURINO FERRARO, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 2:09-cv-1721 GEB JFM (PC) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /001; ferraro.oasc 2. Rule 26 initial disclosure shall be stayed until June 2010, following closing of the pleadings. 3. Further status conference is set for Thursday, April 1, 2010, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom #26 before the undersigned. 4. Non-expert discovery shall be completed, and all motions pertaining to discovery shall be noticed to be heard, by November 21, 2010. 5. Expert discovery shall be completed by December 21, 2010. Rebuttal expert discovery shall be completed by February 21, 2011. The parties are reminded of their obligation to supplement these disclosures when required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e)(1). 6. Dispositive motions shall be noticed to be heard by Thursday, April 7, 2011. 7. The pretrial conference is set for May 26, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. in courtroom #26. Pretrial statements shall be filed pursuant to Local Rule 16-281. 8. Jury trial of this matter is set for Tuesday, August 23, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom #10 before the Honorable Garland E. Burrell, Jr. The parties shall file trial briefs pursuant to Local Rule 16-285. DATED: September 10, 2009. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?