Ferraro v. State of California et al

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 4/1/10 ORDERING that plaintiffs request for modification to the scheduling order is DENIED withoutprejudice; No later than 4/30/10, the parties shall file a status report to update the court on their mediation efforts; This matter is referred to the courts Alternative Dispute Resolution Coordinator, Sujean Younger, for the scheduling of a mediation; and Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on Sujean Younger. (cc ADR)(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MERCURINO FERRARO, an individual and ESTATE OF SALVATORE FERRARO, By and through his Administrator, MERCURINO FERRARO; MERCURINO FERRARO as Guardian Ad-Litem for SAVANAH FERRARO, a minor, Plaintiffs, vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. / No. 2:09-cv-1721 GEB JFM (PC) ORDER On April 1, 2010, the undersigned held a status conference in this matter. Jeremiah House and Rudy Cosio appeared on behalf of plaintiffs. Jeffrey Steele appeared on behalf of defendants. At this conference, plaintiffs requested a modification to the scheduling order. The parties also expressed their interest in participating in mediation. Following statements made by counsel and upon consideration, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs' request for modification to the scheduling order is denied without prejudice; 2. No later than April 30, 2010, the parties shall file a status report to update the court on their mediation efforts; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /014.ferr1721.med 3. This matter is referred to the court's Alternative Dispute Resolution Coordinator, Sujean Younger, for the scheduling of a mediation; and 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on Sujean Younger. DATED: April 1, 2010.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?