Rubio et al v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC et al

Filing 68

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/16/09 ORDERING that on September 17, 2009 Plaintiffs filed a motion for remand of this case to the state court from which it was removed, since the federal claims that were the basis of removal have been dismissed. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) prescribes: "If at any time before final judgment it appears that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded." Therefore, this case is remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Solano, from which it was removed. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 On September 17, 2009 Plaintiffs filed a motion for remand 22 of this case to the state court from which it was removed, since the 23 federal claims that were the basis of removal have been dismissed. 24 U.S.C. § 1447(c) prescribes: "If at any time before final judgment it 25 appears that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case 26 27 28 This matter was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. R. 78-230(h). 1
*

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARLOS RUBIO, an individual; and MARTA RUBIO, an individual,

) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) WAUSAU MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a ) California corporation; GREENPOINT ) MORTGAGE, INC., a corporation; ) BROOKSAMERICA MORTGAGE CORPORATION,) a California corporation; ) MORTGAGE-IT, INC., a corporation; ) AURORA LOAN SERVICES, a ) corporation; INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK; ) WELLS FARGO BANK, FSB; WASHINGTON ) MUTUAL; and DOES 1-50, ) ) Defendants. ) )

2:09-cv-01743-GEB-EFB ORDER*

28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

shall be remanded."

Therefore, this case is remanded to the Superior

Court of California, County of Solano, from which it was removed. Dated: October 16, 2009

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

2