Abel v. Martel et al

Filing 64

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 07/10/12 ordering that plaintiff may file an amended opposition to defendants' pending motion for summary judgment no later than 08/09/12. If plaintiff fails to file an amended opposition by that date, defendants' motion for summary judgment will stand submitted to the court for decision. Any reply to plaintiff's amended opposition shall be due no later than 14 days after service of the amended opposition. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES ABEL, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-1749 JAM CKD P vs. MIKE MARTEL, et al., Defendants. ORDER / Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Woods v. Carey, No. 09-15548 17 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012), the court hereby informs plaintiff of the following requirements for 18 opposing the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants on April 2, 2012. The motion 19 arises under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Such a motion is a request for an 20 order for judgment in favor of the defendant without trial. A defendant’s motion for summary 21 judgment will set forth the facts that the defendant contends are not reasonably subject to dispute 22 and that entitle the defendant to judgment. To oppose a motion for summary judgment, plaintiff 23 must show proof of his or her claims. Plaintiff may do this in one or more of the following ways. 24 Plaintiff may rely on plaintiff’s statements made under penalty of perjury in the complaint if the 25 complaint shows that plaintiff has personal knowledge of the matters stated and plaintiff 26 specifies those parts of the complaint on which plaintiff relies. Plaintiff may serve and file one 1 1 or more affidavits or declarations setting forth the facts that plaintiff believes prove plaintiff’s 2 claims; the person who signs an affidavit or declaration must have personal knowledge of the 3 facts stated. Plaintiff may rely on written records, but plaintiff must prove that the records are 4 what plaintiff asserts they are. Plaintiff may rely on all or any part of the transcript of one or 5 more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or admissions obtained in this proceeding. If 6 plaintiff fails to contradict the defendant’s evidence with counteraffidavits or other admissible 7 evidence, the court may accept defendant’s evidence as true and grant the motion. If there is 8 some good reason why such facts are not available to plaintiff when required to oppose a motion 9 for summary judgment, the court will consider a request to postpone consideration of the 10 defendant’s motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). If plaintiff does not serve and file a written 11 opposition to the motion, or a request to postpone consideration of the motion, the court may 12 consider the failure to act as a waiver of opposition to the defendant’s motion. See L.R. 230(l). 13 If the court grants the motion for summary judgment, whether opposed or unopposed, judgment 14 will be entered for the defendant without a trial and the case will be closed as to that defendant. 15 16 Unsigned affidavits or declarations will be stricken, and affidavits or declarations not signed under penalty of perjury have no evidentiary value. 17 18 Plaintiff now having received the notice required under Woods v. Carey, No. 0915548 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 19 1. Plaintiff may file an amended opposition to defendants’ pending motion for 20 summary judgment no later than August 9, 2012. If plaintiff fails to file an amended opposition 21 by that date, defendants’ motion for summary judgment will stand submitted to the court for 22 decision. 23 ///// 24 ///// 25 ///// 26 ///// 2 1 2 3 2. Any reply to plaintiff’s amended opposition shall be due no later than 14 days after service of the amended opposition. Dated: July 10, 2012 4 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 1 abel1749.not 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?