Abel v. Martel et al
Filing
65
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/21/2012, RECOMMENDING that defendants Kaplan and Walker be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 4(m). Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JAMES ABEL,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. 2:09-cv-1749 JAM CKD P
vs.
MIKE MARTEL, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/
16
On November 18, 2011, plaintiff was ordered to show cause within fourteen days
17
why defendants Kaplan and Walker should not be dismissed for failure to serve process on those
18
defendants within 120 days of the date service of process was approved. Plaintiff has not
19
responded to the court’s order to show cause. Accordingly, the court will recommend that
20
defendants Walker and Kaplan be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
21
Procedure 4(m) for failure to serve process.
22
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendants
23
Kaplan and Walker be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
24
4(m).
25
26
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen
1
1
days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written
2
objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
3
Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the
4
specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951
5
F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
6
Dated: August 21, 2012
7
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
1
abel1749.dis
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?