Lopez v. Schwarzenneger
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/28/2010 ORDERING that the order of the magistrate judge filed 10/6/2009, is affirmed. (Matson, R)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff observes in a footnote that his first name was inaccurately recorded as "Arnold" rather than "Andrew" in the case caption of this order, which was an apparent typographical error; the case caption of the concurrently filed order presented plaintiff's full name accurately in the case caption. See Docket # 6 and Docket # 7. 1
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANDREW RICK LOPEZ, Plaintiff, vs. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants. / On October 19, 2009, plaintiff filed "objections" to the magistrate judge's order filed October 6, 2009 (Docket # 6),1 dismissing plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend, which the court construes as a request for reconsideration of that order. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. \\\\\ \\\\\ \\\\\ ORDER No. CIV S-09-1760 MCE GGH P
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed October 6, 2009, is affirmed. Dated: April 28, 2010 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?