Lopez v. Schwarzenneger

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/19/10 ORDERING that plaintiff is cautioned that he has only until July 30, 2010, to file an amended complaint. As plaintiff was previously informed, there will be no further extension of time. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
(PC) Lopez v. Schwarzenneger, et al. Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants. / By order filed on July 2, 2010, plaintiff was granted an extension of time of twenty-eight days to file an amended complaint. On July 9, 2010, in a note directed to the court clerk, plaintiff enclosed the form the clerk's office had apparently sent to him, returning his amended complaint because plaintiff had failed to provide a case number. In the note, plaintiff indicates that, on July 1, 2010, he separately returned the amended complaint to the court, after he had applied the case number to it. However, although plaintiff's apparently subsequently mailed note with the clerk's notice has been filed, there is no indication in the docket of the return of the amended complaint. Plaintiff is cautioned that he has only until July 30, 2010, to file an amended complaint. As plaintiff was previously informed, there will be no further extension of time. \\\\\ 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANDREW RICK LOPEZ, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-1760 MCE GGH P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 G G H :0 0 9 lo p e 1 7 6 0 .o r d IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 19, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?