Lopez v. Schwarzenneger
Filing
229
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/28/16 ordering the parties request to postpone the filing of a joint statement in accordance with this court's order of 03/17/15 declaring their ability to go forward and any matter related to further proceedings in this case, pending the 04/01/16, filing of plaintiff's motion for orders regarding provision of his legal materials remedying his medical issue, and having a more adequate consultation with his attorney regarding the status of this case is hereby granted. Further, it is hereby ordered that the Office of the California Attorney General shall promptly cooperate with plaintiff's counsel and the Litigation Coordinator at Pelican Bay State Prison t o attempt to obtain plaintiff's access to his legal materials and to address plaintiff's medication problem without need for a motion filed in this court. Additionally, on or before Friday, 05/06/16, the parties shall file their joint statement in accordance with this Court's order filed 03/17/15 225 , unless a joint request for extension of time is timely submitted and demonstrates good cause for further delay. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,
8
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
9
10
ANDREW R. LOPEZ,
No. 2:09-cv-01760 MCE AC P
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO SCHEDULE
STATUS CONFERENCE
13
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
The parties previously stipulated and agreed to extend the date for filing a status
16
17
conference memorandum to March 28, 2016, on the basis that plaintiff’s counsel had not
been cleared by the Attorney Visiting Officer at Pelican Bay State Prison because it was
18
asserted that counsel’s background records check needed to be corrected with
19
additional information. After many unsuccessful attempts to comply with prison staff’s
20
21
22
23
request, on March 9, 2016, counsel filed a motion in plaintiff’s other pending case, Lopez
v. Peterson et al., 2:98-cv-02111-MCE-EFB-P 1 (Doc. #452), for an order directing Pelican
Bay State Prison to grant my request for clearance. The day after the motion was filed,
the clearance was granted by the Attorney Visiting Officer and the motion was
1
The proposed order mistakenly identified this case number as 2:98-cv-01112-MCE-EFB-P.
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Schedule Status Conference;
Lopez v. Schwarzenegger, 2:09-cv-1760 MCE AC P
1
1
withdrawn. (Doc. #453.) The next available date counsel had for the trip to Pelican Bay
2
was March 21, and the visit with Mr. Lopez occurred on March 23.
3
However, at the meeting it was discovered that despite his requests Mr. Lopez
4
had not been provided his legal papers in the Peterson or the Schwarzenegger matters.
5
Consequently, he had not been able to review the materials prior to our meeting and to
6
7
8
9
adequately consult with counsel. Further, shortly after Mr. Lopez transferred to Pelican
Bay on January 29, 2016, his long prescribed pain medication for his chronic back pain
was terminated and nothing other than aspirin was provided in its place.
Consequently, Mr. Lopez has been able to sleep only two to three hours per night and is
currently thoroughly fatigued.
Counsel had conferred with defendants’ counsel, Matthew Ross Wilson, about
10
11
12
the need to postpone the conference memorandum filing date at this time to allow
counsel to file a motion in this case and Peterson for orders regarding Mr. Lopez’s access
to his legal material and to rectify his medical issue. A similar issue was presented in
13
Mr. Lopez’s pending pro per case, Lopez v. Cate et al., 1:10-cv-01773-DAD-SKO-P,2
14
wherein the Deputy Attorney General interceded to have his legal files provided to him
15
16
at Pelican Bay. (See 1:10-cv-01773, Doc. #166.)
The motions will be filed by April 1,
2016, and hopefully, an adequate opportunity to meet and confer with plaintiff would
soon follow.
17
Defendants’ counsel has no opposition to plaintiff’s request and thereby the
18
parties stipulate to postponing the filing of conference memorandum based on the
19
April 1, 2016, filing of plaintiff’s motion in this case and Peterson.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
20
////
21
////
22
23
2
The proposed order mistakenly identified this case number as 2:08-cv-01196-TLN-EFB-P.
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Schedule Status Conference;
Lopez v. Schwarzenegger, 2:09-cv-1760 MCE AC P
2
1
Dated:
March 25, 2016
/s/Robert Navarro
ROBERT NAVARRO
Attorney for Andrew Rick Lopez
2
3
4
Dated:
March 25, 2016
5
6
7
8
WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES
/s/Matthew Ross Wilson
MATTHEW ROSS WILSON
Attorneys for defendants
BEARD, WILLIAMS, PARK, GARCIA,
BERNA, CRONJAGER, GOMEZ,
FLOREZ, McCLURE, BUECHNER, BURT,
FISCHER, RUFF and KISSEL
9
ORDER
10
Based on the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, it is ordered that:
11
12
The parties’ request to postpone the filing of a joint statement in accordance with
this Court’s order of March 17, 2015, declaring their ability to go forward and any
matters related to further proceedings in this case, pending the April 1, 2016, filing of
13
plaintiff’s motion for orders regarding provision of his legal materials and remedying
14
his medical issue, and having a more adequate consultation with his attorney regarding
15
16
the status of this case, IS HEREBY GRANTED.
Further, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Office of the California Attorney
General shall promptly cooperate with plaintiff’s counsel and the Litigation
17
Coordinator at Pelican Bay State Prison to attempt to obtain plaintiff’s access to his legal
18
materials and to address plaintiff’s medication problem without need for a motion filed
19
in this court. Additionally, on or before Friday, May 6, 2016, the parties shall file their
joint statement in accordance with this Court’s order filed March 17, 2015, see ECF No.
20
225, unless a joint request for extension of time is timely submitted and demonstrates
21
good cause for further delay.
22
DATED: March 28, 2016
23
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Schedule Status Conference;
Lopez v. Schwarzenegger, 2:09-cv-1760 MCE AC P
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?