Lopez v. Schwarzenneger
Filing
231
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/11/16 ORDERING that the parties' previously-filed motions for summary judgment, see ECF Nos. 208 , 211 and 212 , shall remain non-operative pursuant to the courts prior order dismissin g each motion without prejudice, see ECF No. 225 . Plaintiff shall file his motion for summary judgment on or before July 29, 2016. Defendants shall file their combined opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment on or before August 26, 201 6. Plaintiff shall file his combined reply and opposition to defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment on or before September 16, 2016. Defendants shall file their reply in support of their cross-motion for summary judgment on or before September 23, 2016. The court will further schedule this case, if necessary, following resolution of the parties' motions for summary judgment.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANDREW RICK LOPEZ,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:09-cv-1760 MCE AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
The parties filed a joint statement on May 6, 2016, informing the court that they are ready
18
to proceed in this case. See ECF No. 230. Pursuant to the parties’ agreed-upon dates, IT IS
19
HEREBY ORDERED that:
20
1. The parties’ previously-filed motions for summary judgment, see ECF Nos. 208, 211
21
and 212, shall remain non-operative pursuant to the court’s prior order dismissing each motion
22
without prejudice, see ECF No. 225.
23
2. Plaintiff shall file his motion for summary judgment on or before July 29, 2016.
24
3. Defendants shall file their combined opposition and cross-motion for summary
25
26
27
28
judgment on or before August 26, 2016.
4. Plaintiff shall file his combined reply and opposition to defendants’ cross-motion for
summary judgment on or before September 16, 2016.
5. Defendants shall file their reply in support of their cross-motion for summary judgment
1
2
3
on or before September 23, 2016.
6. The court will further schedule this case, if necessary, following resolution of the
parties’ motions for summary judgment.
4
SO ORDERED.
5
DATED: May 11, 2016
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?