Lopez v. Schwarzenneger

Filing 231

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/11/16 ORDERING that the parties' previously-filed motions for summary judgment, see ECF Nos. 208 , 211 and 212 , shall remain non-operative pursuant to the courts prior order dismissin g each motion without prejudice, see ECF No. 225 . Plaintiff shall file his motion for summary judgment on or before July 29, 2016. Defendants shall file their combined opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment on or before August 26, 201 6. Plaintiff shall file his combined reply and opposition to defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment on or before September 16, 2016. Defendants shall file their reply in support of their cross-motion for summary judgment on or before September 23, 2016. The court will further schedule this case, if necessary, following resolution of the parties' motions for summary judgment.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANDREW RICK LOPEZ,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:09-cv-1760 MCE AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

The parties filed a joint statement on May 6, 2016, informing the court that they are ready

18

to proceed in this case. See ECF No. 230. Pursuant to the parties’ agreed-upon dates, IT IS

19

HEREBY ORDERED that:

20

1. The parties’ previously-filed motions for summary judgment, see ECF Nos. 208, 211

21

and 212, shall remain non-operative pursuant to the court’s prior order dismissing each motion

22

without prejudice, see ECF No. 225.

23

2. Plaintiff shall file his motion for summary judgment on or before July 29, 2016.

24

3. Defendants shall file their combined opposition and cross-motion for summary

25
26
27
28

judgment on or before August 26, 2016.
4. Plaintiff shall file his combined reply and opposition to defendants’ cross-motion for
summary judgment on or before September 16, 2016.
5. Defendants shall file their reply in support of their cross-motion for summary judgment

1
2
3

on or before September 23, 2016.
6. The court will further schedule this case, if necessary, following resolution of the
parties’ motions for summary judgment.

4

SO ORDERED.

5

DATED: May 11, 2016

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2