Fordjour v. Napolitano et al
Filing
75
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/16/2010 DENYING w/out prejudice, ptnr's motions 58 demand for jury trial, 59 for issuance of an OTC, 60 to expedite, 61 and 62 for status. (Yin, K)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. JANET NAPOLITANO, et al. Respondents. / Petitioner is currently in the custody of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE"). He seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his detention. By order dated February 2, 2010, this court ordered consolidation of the above-captioned action with petitioner's other habeas petition, Case No. Civ. S-09-2806 FCD CMK, and appointed counsel to represent petitioner. At that time, petitioner had pending four miscellaneous motions filed in pro se in Case No. Civ. S-09-2806 FCD CMK. Dckt. Nos. 58 (demand for jury trial), 59 (motion for an order to show cause why the petition should not be granted), 60 (motion to expedite ruling on Dckt. No. 59), 61 (motion for status on Dckt. No. 59), 62 (renewed motion for an order to show cause and request for status). As petitioner is now represented by counsel, those motions are denied without prejudice to any renewal by counsel. ////
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHARLES FORDJOUR, Petitioner, No. CIV S-09-1800 JAM EFB P
ORDER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's "Emergency Motion Demand for Jury Trial" filed November 24, 2009 (Dckt. No. 58), "Emergency Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause" filed November 24, 2009 (Dckt. No. 59), "Emergency Motion to Expedite" filed December 7, 2009 (Dckt. No. 60), "Emergency Motion for Status" filed January 4, 2010 (Dckt. No. 61), and "Emergency Requests for Status" filed January 15, 2010 (Dckt. No. 62) are denied without prejudice. Dated: June 16, 2010.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?