Bailey v. Clark

Filing 25

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 1/5/10 ORDERING that within ten days from the date of this order respondent shall file and serve a response to petitioners 12/28/09 motion to compel.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 2 ;ba il18 5 6 .bm tc IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES BAILEY, Petitioner, vs. KEN CLARK, Respondent. / Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent has moved to dismiss this action as barred by the statute of limitations, and petitioner's opposition to the motion is due on or before January 22, 2010. On December 28, 2009, petitioner filed a motion to compel by which he seeks documents and information which may be related to matters at issue in the motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within ten days from the date of this order respondent shall file and serve a response to petitioner's December 28, 2009 motion to compel. DATED: January 5, 2010. ORDER No. 2:09-cv-1856 GEB JFM (HC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?