MB Service Station, LLC v. ConocoPhillips Company

Filing 11

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/16/2009 ORDERING 10 that defendant's time to respond to complaint is EXTENDED to 9/15/2009. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND COP'S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, THE COURT ORDERS that ConocoPhillips Company's ("COP") time to respond to Plaintiff's complaint is extended to September 15, 2009 so that the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation can rule on COP's request that this action be consolidated into MDL No. 2040 as a "Tag-Along Action" pursuant to Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Rule 7.4, and Plaintiff can file its motion for remand. Should the Panel not rule on COP's request by September 15, 2009, COP shall report further to the Court so that it may revisit whether a further stay would be appropriate. /// /// UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, a Texas ) corporation and DOES 1 through 10, ) Inclusive, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) MB SERVICE STATION, Case No. 2:09-CV-01868-WBS-DAD ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY'S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 1 2 Nothing herein shall prevent Plaintiff's ability to seek a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction against COP before COP has responded to the complaint. 3 Dated: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 July 16, 2009 -2ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND COP'S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?