Ventura v. Sisto et al
Filing
16
ORDER denying 13 Motion to Stay signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 08/16/10. Their response to petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is due within 30 days (Plummer, M)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
1/mp vent1873.dsty
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANTONIO VENTURA, Petitioner, vs. D.K. SISTO, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On March 15, 2010, respondent requested that this matter be stayed pending the Ninth Circuit's en banc decision in Hayward v. Marshall. The en banc decision has issued: Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546 (9th Cir. 2010). Therefore, respondents' request for a stay (#13) is denied as unnecessary at this time, and their response to petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is due within thirty days. See January 13, 2010 order. DATED: August 16, 2010. ORDER No. CIV S-09-1873 MCE KJM P
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
