Navarro v. Herdon et al
Filing
108
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/7/13 ORDERING that Plaintiffs request for an extension of time 106 is GRANTED; plaintiff shall serve his subject discovery responses within 30 days after service of this order. Plaintiffs requests for appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 96 and 100 ), are DENIED without prejudice. (Dillon, M)
(PC) Navarro v. Herdon et al
Doc. 108
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
MARIO NAVARRO,
11
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
No. 2:09-cv-1878 KJM KJN P
vs.
DEBRA HERNDON, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
/
Plaintiff requests a thirty-day extension of time to serve responses to each of the
17
eight defendants’ separate interrogatories and production requests. Plaintiff states that he
18
continues to await the compilation and delivery of his full CDCR file, which he requires to
19
respond fully to defendants’ discovery requests. The court has previously granted defendants’
20
requests for extended time to respond to discovery, and the discovery deadline has been extended
21
to November 1, 2013. Therefore, plaintiff’s request for an extension of time will be granted.
22
In addition, plaintiff again requests appointment of counsel. Plaintiff's previous
23
requests were filed on July 9, 2009, November 29, 2010, and January 22, 2013. All requests
24
were denied. In light of the reasoning set forth in the court’s prior orders (see ECF Nos. 21, 42,
25
86), as well as the pendency of defendants’ recently-filed motion to dismiss (ECF No. 107),
26
which is premised on plaintiff’s alleged failure to exhaust his administrative remedies (an
Dockets.Justia.com
1
objective matter that does require the assistance of counsel), plaintiff’s pending requests for
2
appointment of counsel will be denied without prejudice.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time (ECF No. 106), is granted; plaintiff
5
shall serve his subject discovery responses within thirty (30) days after service of this order.
6
2. Plaintiff’s requests for appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 96 and 100), are
7
denied without prejudice.
8
DATED: August 7, 2013
9
10
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
nava1878.eot.cnsl
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?