Navarro v. Herdon et al
Filing
110
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/27/13 GRANTING 109 Motion to conduct Plaintiff Mario Navarros deposition via videoconference. However, the court reporter must be physically located where the plaintiff is located. Moreover, nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is housed to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
MARIO NAVARRO,
2:09-CV-1878 GEB KJN P
13
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER
14
v.
15
16
DEBRA HERNDON, ET, AL. ,
17
Defendants.
18
19
Defendants’ request to conduct Plaintiff Mario Navarro’s deposition via videoconference,
20
pursuant to Rule 30(b)(4), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is hereby granted. However, the
21
court reporter must be physically located where the plaintiff is located. Moreover, nothing in this
22
Order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is housed to obtain
23
videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available.
24
25
SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 27, 2013
26
27
28
nava1878.depo.video
1
[Proposed] Order (2:09-CV-1878 GEB KJN P)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?