Navarro v. Herdon et al

Filing 110

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/27/13 GRANTING 109 Motion to conduct Plaintiff Mario Navarros deposition via videoconference. However, the court reporter must be physically located where the plaintiff is located. Moreover, nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is housed to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 MARIO NAVARRO, 2:09-CV-1878 GEB KJN P 13 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER 14 v. 15 16 DEBRA HERNDON, ET, AL. , 17 Defendants. 18 19 Defendants’ request to conduct Plaintiff Mario Navarro’s deposition via videoconference, 20 pursuant to Rule 30(b)(4), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is hereby granted. However, the 21 court reporter must be physically located where the plaintiff is located. Moreover, nothing in this 22 Order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is housed to obtain 23 videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. 24 25 SO ORDERED. Dated: August 27, 2013 26 27 28 nava1878.depo.video 1 [Proposed] Order (2:09-CV-1878 GEB KJN P)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?