Johnson v. Sacramento Auto Insurance Center Inc. et al
Filing
10
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/22/2009 ORDERING that Sacramento Auto Insurance Center, Inc. is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(2). (Suttles, J)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 PMB #253 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 FAX (916) 481-4224 E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: CIV.S 09-cv-01886-JAM-GGH STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF SACRAMENTO AUTO INSURANCE CENTER, INC. AND ORDER
SCOTT N. JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs.
Sacramento Auto Insurance Center, Inc., et al, Complaint Filed: JULY 10, 2009 Defendants CASE TO REMAIN OPEN WITH REMAINING DEFENDANTS
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiff, Scott N. Johnson, that Defendant (Sacramento Auto Insurance Center, Inc.) be and is hereby dismissed WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(2). This case is to remain open with remaining Defendants. Defendant (Sacramento Auto Insurance Center, Inc.) is dismissed because Plaintiff and this Defendant have settled their dispute.
1 STIPULATED DISMISSAL and Proposed ORDER CIV: S-09-01886-JAM-GGH
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dated: October 19, 2009
/s/Scott N. Johnson____________ SCOTT N. JOHNSON Attorney for Plaintiff /s/Christopher W. Ewing ________ CHRISTOPHER W. EWING Attorney for Defendants, SACRAMENTO AUTO INSURANCE CENTER, INC.
Dated: October 20, 2009
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 22, 2009 /s/ John A. Mendez___________________ U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
2 STIPULATED DISMISSAL and Proposed ORDER CIV: S-09-01886-JAM-GGH
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?