McPhearson v. Ives et al
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/16/09 DIRECTING RESPONDENT to file a response to the petition w/in 60 days; traverse due w/in 30 days of answer; an opposition or statement of non-opposition due w/in 30 days of motion to dismiss; and the clerk to serve copies of this order along w/ the petition for writ of habeas corpus on Mark J. McKeon. (Yin, K)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Respondent. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / Petitioner, a federal prisoner confined at Federal Correctional Institution at Herlong, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has paid the filing fee. Since petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to file an answer or a motion to dismiss. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Respondent is directed to file an answer or a motion to dismiss within sixty days from the date of this order. If an answer is filed, respondent shall include with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application. 1 ORDER vs. RICHARD B. IVES, Warden, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PEDRO MCPHEARSON, Petitioner, No. CIV S-09-1889 JAM DAD P
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
2. Petitioner's traverse, if any, is due on or before thirty days from the date respondent's answer is filed; an opposition to a motion to dismiss is due within thirty days of service of the motion to dismiss; 3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on Mark Joseph McKeon, United States Attorney's Office, 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401, Fresno, CA 93721. DATED: July 16, 2009.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?