Burke v. Starbucks Coffee Company

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/29/10 ORDERING that the Parties' Stipulated Protective Order is GRANTED with the following modifications. Procedurally, the parties must comply with E. D. Local Rules 141 and 141.1 regardi ng the sealing of documents. Any confidential material filed with the court, sealed or otherwise, will not be returned at the conclusion of the litigation. This order does not purport to bind other courts in the conduct of their business. (Zignago, K.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, Defendant. / This court has considered the Parties' Proposed Stipulated Protective Order. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties' Stipulated Protective Order is GRANTED with the following modifications. The substantive standards set forth by the Ninth Circuit for filing documents under seal are found in Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass'n., 565 F.3d 1106, 1115 (9th Cir. 2009) and Phillips v. General Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210 (9th Cir. 2002). Procedurally, the parties must comply with E. D. Local Rules 141 and 141.1 regarding the sealing of documents. Any confidential material filed with the court, sealed or otherwise, will not be returned at the conclusion of the litigation. //// 1 ORDER BRITTA BURKE, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-1920 GEB GGH IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Burke1920.mod.wpd

This order does not purport to bind other courts in the conduct of their business. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 29, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2