Lopez v. Hubbard, et al

Filing 56

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/15/2010 RECOMMENDING that dft's 46 motion to dismiss be granted. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. SUE HUBBARD, et al., Defendants. / On April 28, 2010, defendant Garcia filed a motion to dismiss (Doc. 46). On May 17, 2010, plaintiff filed a non-opposition to the motion to dismiss (Doc. 51). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant's motion to dismiss be granted (Doc. 46) and defendant Garcia be dismissed from this action. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the \\\\\ \\\\\ FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS KENNETH LOPEZ, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-1928 GEB GGH P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: June 15, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 G G H : AB lo p e 1 9 2 8 .fr 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?