Johnson v. Fulton-El Camino Recreation & Parks District

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/5/10 ORDERING that the deadline to disclose expert witnesses is extended to 5/14/2010; the deadline to disclose rebuttal expert witnesses is extended to 6/14/10. (Owen, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ALDEN J. PARKER (SBN 196808) MEAGAN D. CHRISTIANSEN (SBN 240679) BASHAM PARKER LLP 701 University Avenue, Suite 220 Sacramento, California 95825 Telephone: (916) 925-5850 Facsimile: (916) 925-5854 Attorneys for Defendant FULTON-EL CAMINO RECREATION & PARKS DISTRICT MICHAEL PAZDERNIK (SBN 144337) ADAMS & CORZINE 740 Oak Avenue Parkway, Suite 120 Folsom, CA 95630 Tele: (916) 983-3900 Facsimile: (916) 983-3922 Attorney for Plaintiff STEVEN D. JOHNSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVEN D. JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. FULTON-EL CAMINO RECREATION & PARKS DISTRICT and DOES 1 To 50, Defendants. Case No. 2:09-cv-01930-GEB-EFB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINE FOR THE DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES Trial Date: April 19, 2011 WHEREAS, as based on the April 19, 2011 trial date, the deadline to disclose expert witnesses is April 1, 2010, and the deadline to disclose rebuttal expert witnesses in May 3, 2010, in this matter; WHEREAS, the parties jointly agreed and stipulated to and the Court ordered a continuance of the deadline date for disclosure of expert witnesses from April 1, 2010 to May 3, 2010 and the deadline date for the disclosure of rebuttal witnesses from May 3, 2010 to June 3, 2010; Stipulation and Order to Continue the Deadline for the Disclosure of Expert Witnesses 1 Case No. 2:09-cv-01930-GEB-EFB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, the parties jointly agreed and stipulated to respectfully request that this Court grant a continuance of the deadline date for disclosure of expert witnesses from May 3, 2010 to May 14, 2010 and the deadline date for the disclosure of rebuttal witnesses from June 3, 2010 to June 14, 2010; WHEREAS, this request is being made due to the fact that the expert witness retained by Defendant suffered an injury last week which has made completion of his written report disclosing himself as an expert witness in this matter impossible; WHEREAS, this request is not being made of the purposes of delay, or any other improper purpose; WHEREAS, the trial date in this matter is not for approximately eleven months; WHEREAS, continuing the deadline for disclosing the expert witnesses and rebuttal expert witnesses will not prejudice either party or their counsel; and NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys of record, that this Court continue the deadline for the disclosure of expert witnesses and rebuttal expert witnesses. Dated: May 3, 2010 ADAMS & CORZINE By: /s/ Michael Pazdernik MICHAEL PAZDERNIK Attorney for Plaintiff STEVEN D. JOHNSON Dated: May 3, 2010 BASHAM PARKER LLP By: /s/ Meagan D. Christiansen ALDEN J. PARKER MEAGAN D. CHRISTIANSEN Attorneys for Defendant FULTON-EL CAMINO RECREATION AND PARKS DISTRICT Stipulation and Order to Continue the Deadline for the Disclosure of Expert Witnesses 2 Case No. 2:09-cv-01930-GEB-EFB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Order to Continue the Deadline for the Disclosure of Expert Witnesses ORDER Having reviewed the Stipulation of the parties, the deadline to disclose expert witnesses, currently set for May 3, 2010, be continued to May 14, 2010; and the deadline to disclose rebuttal expert witnesses, currently set for June 3, 2010, be continued to June 14, 2010. Date: 5/5/10 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 3 Case No. 2:09-cv-01930-GEB-EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?