United States of America v. Real Property located at 1 Mile Up Hennessey Road, Burnt Ranch, California, APN: 008-430-02

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/14/2010 ORDERING that the Status Conference is continued to 5/24/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.; a joint status report addressing the issues listed in 4 Order 'Requiring Joint Status Report' is due 14 days prior to hearing. (Suttles, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KRISTIN S. DOOR, SBN 84307 Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916)554-2723 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 2:09-cv-1940 GEB/KJM ) Plaintiff, ) PLAINTIFF'S STATUS (PRETRIAL ) SCHEDULING) REPORT AND v. ) ORDER ) REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1 MILE ) UP HENNESSEY ROAD, BURNT RANCH, ) CALIFORNIA, TRINITY COUNTY, ) APN: 008-430-02, INCLUDING ) DATE: January 19, 2010 ALL APPURTENANCES AND ) TIME: 9:00 a.m. IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, ) COURTROOM: 10 ) Defendant. ) ) The plaintiff United States of America submits the following Joint Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Report.1 a. Service: The forfeiture complaint in rem was served on all individuals and entities believed to have an interest in the Plaintiff attempted to get claimant's counsel's input for this report. Attorney Lerman made some changes to an initial draft prepared by undersigned counsel, but as of the time this report was filed had not responded to changes proposed by undersigned counsel. 1 P L A I N T I F F ' S STATUS (PRETRIAL S C H E D U L I N G ) REPORT AND ORDER (PROPOSED) 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 defendant property. were served. Specifically, Thomas Pickle and James Pickle Thomas Pickle is the owner of record of the defendant real property and was living in one of two residences on the property. James Pickle was living in a second residence. In addition, in accordance with the Order for Publication signed on July 16, 2009, by U.S. Magistrate Judge Drozd, notice of this action was published on the official internet government website, www.forfeiture.gov, for 30 consecutive days. The Declaration of Plaintiff was filed on September 21, 2009. b. Possible joinder of additional parties: Plaintiff does not anticipate joining additional parties. Claimant anticipates a joinder, through conservatorship proceedings, of Thomas Pickle's wife. (See section e.) Plaintiff will oppose any effort by any person to file a claim at this late date. "Thomas Pickle" is the only name that appears on the title report for the defendant property and he is listed as "Thomas A. Pickle, and unmarried man, as his sole and separate property." c. Any expected or desired amendment of pleadings: None anticipated at this time. d. Jurisdiction and venue: This Court has jurisdiction in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345 and 1355. U.S.C. § 1395. e. Anticipated motions and suggested dates: This Court has venue pursuant to 28 On or before January 8, 2010, Plaintiff will be filing a motion to strike the claim and answer filed by Thomas Pickle. Plaintiff will notice the motion on the next date available on the Court's calendar. If the Court grants the motion, plaintiff 2 P L A I N T I F F ' S STATUS (PRETRIAL S C H E D U L I N G ) REPORT AND ORDER (PROPOSED) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 will move for a default judgment and final judgment of forfeiture. Accordingly, the plaintiff suggests that this case need not be scheduled at this time. Thomas Pickle has been missing since July 2009, and his attorney believes he is dead. Mr. Pickle's last whereabouts was Counsel Editte hiking in the mountains of Northern California. Lerman was contacted on January 5, 2010, via phone message, by attorney Darren Wright, who is representing Erlinda Selma Pickle, Thomas Pickle's wife, in a conservatorship case involving Mr. Pickle's estate. Attorney Darren Wright stated that he was calling to talk about the forfeiture proceedings that are involved in the criminal case since they may involve the conservatorship estate and her estate. Accordingly, Claimant anticipates a joinder by Erlinda Selma Pickle. Plaintiff does not have sufficient information to form an opinion as to whether Pickle is dead or is a fugitive. And as noted above, plaintiff will oppose any effort by anyone to file a claim at this late date. f. (1) Anticipated and outstanding discovery: What changes should be made in the timing, form, or requirement for disclosures under Rule 26(a), including a statement as to when disclosures under subdivision (a)(1) were made or will be made: The subjects on which discovery may be needed, when discovery should be completed, and whether discovery should be conducted in phases or be limited to or focused upon particular issues: What changes should be made in the limitations on discovery imposed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure of the Local Rules, and what other limitations should be imposed: 3 P L A I N T I F F ' S STATUS (PRETRIAL S C H E D U L I N G ) REPORT AND ORDER (PROPOSED) (2) (3) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 As of the December 1, 2006, amendments to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, civil forfeiture actions are now exempt from the initial disclosure requirements applicable to most other civil actions. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(B)(ii). Rather than schedule this case at this time, plaintiff suggests that the status conference be continued 120 days to allow time for a hearing on the motion to strike and a ruling on the motion. Claimant suggests that the status conference be continued 120 days to allow time for attorney Darren Wright to determine the ramifications of the conservatorship case involving Mr. Pickle's estate, and to file necessary motions accordingly. g. Scheduling of future proceedings, including suggested timing of the disclosure of expert witnesses and information required by Rule 26(a)(2), completion dates for discovery and law and motion, and dates for final pretrial conference and trial: In light of the request to continue the status conference 120 days, plaintiff suggests that the case not be scheduled at this time. i. Estimate of trial time: Plaintiff estimates that a trial of this matter would take no more than 3 days. j. Appropriateness of special procedures: Not applicable. k. Modification of standard pretrial procedures because of the relative simplicity or complexity of the action or proceedings: Not applicable. l. Whether the case is related to any other case, including any matters in bankruptcy: 4 P L A I N T I F F ' S STATUS (PRETRIAL S C H E D U L I N G ) REPORT AND ORDER (PROPOSED) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 This case is related to U.S. v. 17 Coon Creek Road, 2:09-cv1937 GEB/KJM. 2009. m. Prospects for settlement: Plaintiff will move promptly for a A Notice of Related Cases was filed on July 17, None at this time. clerk's default pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(1) against Thomas and James Pickle if the motion to strike the claim and answer is granted, and then will move for final judgment of forfeiture. n. None. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this matter: 11 12 13 By: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 P L A I N T I F F ' S STATUS (PRETRIAL S C H E D U L I N G ) REPORT AND ORDER (PROPOSED) DATED: January 6, 2010 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney /s/ Kristin S. Door KRISTIN S. DOOR Assistant U.S. Attorney ORDER For the reasons set forth above, the status conference now scheduled for January 19, 2010, is continued to May 24, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report addressing the issues listed in the Court's July 16, 2009, Order Setting Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference shall be filed fourteen days prior to the hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 14, 2010 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?