Clark v. Rolling Hills Casino et al

Filing 30

ORDER adopting in full 28 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/24/11. Defendants' motion to dismiss 15 is GRANTED. Defendants Rolling Hills Casino, Felix, and Pata are DISMISSED from this action; and this action shall continue as to defendants Bennett and Benson only. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROGER CLARK, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. CIV S-09-1948-JAM-CMK vs. ORDER ROLLING HILLS CASINO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, proceeding in pro per, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern 19 District of California local rules. 20 On April 18, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have 23 been filed. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 26 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 18, 2011, are adopted in 4 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 15) is granted; 5 3. Defendants Rolling Hills Casino, Felix and Pata are dismissed from this 4. This action shall continue as to defendants Bennett and Benson only. 3 6 7 8 full; action; and DATED: May 24, 2011 9 10 /s/ John A. Mendez 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?