Clark v. Rolling Hills Casino et al
Filing
30
ORDER adopting in full 28 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/24/11. Defendants' motion to dismiss 15 is GRANTED. Defendants Rolling Hills Casino, Felix, and Pata are DISMISSED from this action; and this action shall continue as to defendants Bennett and Benson only. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROGER CLARK,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. CIV S-09-1948-JAM-CMK
vs.
ORDER
ROLLING HILLS CASINO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
/
17
Plaintiff, proceeding in pro per, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern
19
District of California local rules.
20
On April 18, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations
21
herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file
22
objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have
23
been filed.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis.
26
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed April 18, 2011, are adopted in
4
2.
Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 15) is granted;
5
3.
Defendants Rolling Hills Casino, Felix and Pata are dismissed from this
4.
This action shall continue as to defendants Bennett and Benson only.
3
6
7
8
full;
action; and
DATED: May 24, 2011
9
10
/s/ John A. Mendez
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?