Roe, et al v. United States of America, et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/14/11. CASE CLOSED (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 WILCOXEN CALLAHAM, LLP E.S. DEACON, SBN 127638 MARTHA A. TAYLOR, SBN 260692 2114 K Street Sacramento, California 95816 Telephone: (916) 442-2777 Facsimile: (916) 442-4118 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ANN ROE & ROBERT ROE 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ANNE ROE and ROBERT ROE, Case No. 2:09-CV-01958-MCE-GGH Plaintiffs, 2114 K Street, Sacramento, California 95816 WILCOXEN CALLAHAM, LLP 11 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 12 -vs13 14 15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 _______________________________/ 18 19 The parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that the Complaint 20 in this action and all amended complaints, shall be dismissed, with prejudice, in its 21 entirety. It is further stipulated that each party bear their own costs, including 22 attorney’s fees. 23 Dated: October 11, 2011 WILCOXEN CALLAHAM, LLP 24 /s/ Martha A. Taylor ______________________________ E.S. DEACON, SBN 127638 MARTHA A. TAYLOR, SBN 260692 Attorneys for Plaintiff, ANNE ROE 25 26 27 28 /// 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSALWITH PREJUDICE 00038599 1 Dated: October 11, 2011 ASSISTANT UNITED STATE ATTORNEY 2 By: 3 4 /s/ J. Earlene Gordon __________________________ J. EARLENE GORDON Attorney for Defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 5 6 7 ORDER 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 9 10 Dated: October 14, 2011 11 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSALWITH PREJUDICE 00038599

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?