Roe, et al v. United States of America, et al
Filing
21
STIPULATION and ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/14/11. CASE CLOSED (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
WILCOXEN CALLAHAM, LLP
E.S. DEACON, SBN 127638
MARTHA A. TAYLOR, SBN 260692
2114 K Street
Sacramento, California 95816
Telephone: (916) 442-2777
Facsimile: (916) 442-4118
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ANN ROE & ROBERT ROE
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
ANNE ROE and ROBERT ROE,
Case No. 2:09-CV-01958-MCE-GGH
Plaintiffs,
2114 K Street, Sacramento, California 95816
WILCOXEN CALLAHAM, LLP
11
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
12
-vs13
14
15
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY; TRANSPORTATION
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and DOES
1 through 10, inclusive,
16
Defendants.
17
_______________________________/
18
19
The parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that the Complaint
20
in this action and all amended complaints, shall be dismissed, with prejudice, in its
21
entirety. It is further stipulated that each party bear their own costs, including
22
attorney’s fees.
23
Dated: October 11, 2011
WILCOXEN CALLAHAM, LLP
24
/s/ Martha A. Taylor
______________________________
E.S. DEACON, SBN 127638
MARTHA A. TAYLOR, SBN 260692
Attorneys for Plaintiff, ANNE ROE
25
26
27
28
///
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSALWITH PREJUDICE
00038599
1
Dated: October 11, 2011
ASSISTANT UNITED STATE ATTORNEY
2
By:
3
4
/s/ J. Earlene Gordon
__________________________
J. EARLENE GORDON
Attorney for Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
5
6
7
ORDER
8
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
9
10
Dated: October 14, 2011
11
________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSALWITH PREJUDICE
00038599
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?