Charity v. Brown et al

Filing 31

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 5/3/2010 ADOPTING 30 Findings and Recommendations in full. Resp's 24 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Claim four of the petition is DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases; Resp is ordered to file an answer to the remaining claims within 30 days. (Engbretson, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. EDMUND BROWN, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 23, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: ///// 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TIMMY O'NEIL CHARITY, Petitioner, No. CIV S-09-1968 FCD GGH P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 23, 2010, are adopted in full; 2. Respondent's motion to dismiss (no. 24) is denied; 3. Claim four of the petition is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases; respondent is ordered to file an answer to the remaining claims within thirty days of the filed date of this order. DATED: May 3, 2010. _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?