Harper v. California Department of Corrections et al

Filing 39

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/20/11 ORDERING that 38 Motion will be placed in the file and disregarded. Plaintiff is advised that the court will disregard, and will issue no response to, any future filings in this closed case. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

DANIEL HARPER,

11
12
13

Plaintiff,

No. 2:09-cv-01969 GEB KJN P

vs.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,

14

ORDER
Defendants.

15

/

16

On April 13, 2011, plaintiff filed a document entitled “Motion Not to Dismiss

17

Due to Fees.” This prisoner civil rights action was closed on March 31, 2011, when the case was

18

dismissed and judgment was entered. Plaintiff’s recent filing is not one contemplated by the

19

Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure. This document will therefore be disregarded.

20

The Clerk of Court is directed to vacate the “motion.” Plaintiff is advised that the court will

21

disregard, and will issue no response to, any future filings in this closed case.

22
23

SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 20, 2011

24
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26

harp1969.closed