McCoy v. Department of the Army et al
Filing
110
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/13/2012 GRANTING 108 Request to continue trial. Jury Trial CONTINUED to 5/15/2012 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Donati, J)
1
2
3
4
5
LAWRENCE A. ORGAN (SBN 175503)
BARBARA E. FIGARI (SBN 251942)
EQUALITY LAWYERS LLP
407 San Anselmo Avenue, Suite 201
San Anselmo, CA 94960
T. 415.453.4740
F. 415.963.4301
larry@equalitylawyers.com
barbara@equalitylawyers.com
8
John Ota (SBN 195532)
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN OTA
1720 Broadway
Alameda, CA 94501
T. 510.521.7047
johnota@sbcglobal.net
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff ROSLYN G. MCCOY
6
7
10
11
12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
(SACRAMENTO DIVISION)
15
16
17
ROSLYN G. McCOY,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
CASE NO: 2:09-CV-01973 LKK-CMK
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED
REQUEST TO CONTINUE TRIAL
vs.
JOHN MCHUGH, SECRETARY OF
THE ARMY, collectively,
22
23
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
1
_____________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED REQUEST TO CONTINUE TRIAL
Case No. 2:09-CV-01973 LKK-CMK
1
2
ORDER
This matter came before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Request to Continue the
3
Trial Date to June 26, 2012. For the reasons stated in the Unopposed Request and for good cause
4
showing under Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court GRANTS the relief
5
requested therein.
6
Accordingly,
7
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT
8
9
10
11
1. The trial is CONTINUED TO May 15, 2012 at 10:30 a.m., with all other dates to be
based on the new trial date.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: February 13, 2012
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
_____________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED REQUEST TO CONTINUE TRIAL
Case No. 2:09-CV-01973 LKK-CMK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?