McCoy v. Department of the Army et al

Filing 110

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/13/2012 GRANTING 108 Request to continue trial. Jury Trial CONTINUED to 5/15/2012 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 LAWRENCE A. ORGAN (SBN 175503) BARBARA E. FIGARI (SBN 251942) EQUALITY LAWYERS LLP 407 San Anselmo Avenue, Suite 201 San Anselmo, CA 94960 T. 415.453.4740 F. 415.963.4301 larry@equalitylawyers.com barbara@equalitylawyers.com 8 John Ota (SBN 195532) LAW OFFICES OF JOHN OTA 1720 Broadway Alameda, CA 94501 T. 510.521.7047 johnota@sbcglobal.net 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff ROSLYN G. MCCOY 6 7 10 11 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 (SACRAMENTO DIVISION) 15 16 17 ROSLYN G. McCOY, Plaintiff, 18 19 20 21 CASE NO: 2:09-CV-01973 LKK-CMK ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED REQUEST TO CONTINUE TRIAL vs. JOHN MCHUGH, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, collectively, 22 23 Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 1 _____________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED REQUEST TO CONTINUE TRIAL Case No. 2:09-CV-01973 LKK-CMK 1 2 ORDER This matter came before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Request to Continue the 3 Trial Date to June 26, 2012. For the reasons stated in the Unopposed Request and for good cause 4 showing under Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court GRANTS the relief 5 requested therein. 6 Accordingly, 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT 8 9 10 11 1. The trial is CONTINUED TO May 15, 2012 at 10:30 a.m., with all other dates to be based on the new trial date. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: February 13, 2012 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 _____________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED REQUEST TO CONTINUE TRIAL Case No. 2:09-CV-01973 LKK-CMK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?