Nunez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 23

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/30/2010 ORDERING that Pltf shall SHOW CAUSE in writing, within 30 days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file a dispositive motion. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
(SS) Nunez v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Defendant. 16 / 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Pursuant to the court's scheduling order, plaintiff is required to prosecute this action by either seeking voluntary remand or filing a dispositive motion within 45 days from the date of service of the administrative record by defendant. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. A review of the docket reflects that, following numerous extensions of time, plaintiff's dispositive motion was due by September 22, 2010. To date, plaintiff has not filed a dispositive motion. 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL NUNEZ, Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, No. CIV S-09-1975-CMK ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file a dispositive motion. Plaintiff is again warned that failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of the action for the reasons outlined above, as well as for failure to prosecute and comply with court rules and orders. See id. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 30, 2010 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?