Cardona v. Walker et al

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/1/09 ORDERING that plaintiffs 11/13/09 document styled Objection is disregarded.(Dillon, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff is advised that this civil rights action was dismissed as duplicative and closed on November 3, 2009. Documents filed by plaintiff since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. ///// ///// ///// 1 vs. JAMES WALKER, et al., Defendants. / On November 13, 2009, plaintiff filed a document styled "Objection." Plaintiff's document is difficult to decipher. Therein, he states: On Nov 9, 2009 Plaintiff, a state prisoner in pro se, has file a objection to findings and recommendation were order within twenty day (20) Plaintiff herein request judge's analysis granted my request/with a extention. ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MELECIO M. CARDONA, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-1976 FCD DAD P

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:9 card1976.58

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's November 13, 2009 document styled "Objection." is disregarded. DATED: December 1, 2009.

2