Huynh v. Hubbard et al

Filing 29

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/1/12 ORDERING that plaintiff has now received the notice required under Woods v. Carey, No. 09- 15548 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012). If plaintiff requires an extension of time to prepare his opposition to defendants motion to dismiss, he may so request.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAI HUYNH, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. 2:09-cv-1979 CKD P CALLISON, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Woods v. Carey, No. 09-15548 17 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012), the court hereby reminds plaintiff of the following requirements for 18 opposing the motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies filed by defendants 19 on July 23, 2012.1 (Dkt. No. 28.) 20 Pursuant to Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1120 n.14 (9th Cir. 2003), the court 21 hereby informs plaintiff of the following requirements for opposing a motion to dismiss for 22 failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b). Such a motion is a 23 request that the court dismiss without prejudice any unexhausted claims. The moving party may 24 25 26 1 Defendants also argue that the Second Amended Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Defendants provided Woods notice in their Notice of Motion (Dkt. No. 23 at 2-3), and the court provides this independent notice in an abundance of caution. 1 1 submit affidavits or declarations under penalty of perjury and admissible documents to support 2 the motion to dismiss. To oppose the motion, plaintiff may likewise file declarations under 3 penalty of perjury and admissible documents. Plaintiff may rely on plaintiff’s statements made 4 under penalty of perjury in the complaint if the complaint shows that plaintiff has personal 5 knowledge of the matters stated and plaintiff specifies the parts of the complaint on which 6 plaintiff relies. Plaintiff may also rely on one or more affidavits or declarations sworn to by other 7 persons who have personal knowledge of relevant matters. In addition, plaintiff may rely on 8 written records, but plaintiff must prove that the records are what plaintiff asserts they are. If 9 plaintiff fails to contradict defendant’s evidence with admissible evidence, the court may rely on 10 defendant’s evidence. In the event both sides submit matters outside of the pleadings, the court 11 may look beyond the pleadings and decide disputed issues of fact. If plaintiff does not file a 12 written opposition to the motion, the court may consider the failure to act as a waiver of 13 opposition to the motion. See L.R. 230(l). If the court grants the motion to dismiss, whether 14 opposed or unopposed, plaintiff’s unexhausted claims will be dismissed without prejudice. 15 Plaintiff has now received the notice required under Woods v. Carey, No. 09- 16 15548 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012). If plaintiff requires an extension of time to prepare his opposition 17 to defendants’ motion to dismiss, he may so request. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 Dated: August 1, 2012 20 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 2 huyn1979.not 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?