Huynh v. Hubbard et al

Filing 47

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/27/2013 ADOPTING 39 Findings and Recommendation in Full and GRANTING-IN-PART and DENYING-IN-PART 28 Motion to Dismiss. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAI HUYNH, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:09-cv-01979 MCE CKD P v. CALLISON, et al., Defendants. ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant 18 to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On January 29, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 (ECF No. 39) which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On 22 February 26, 2013, Plaintiff was granted a 30 day extension of time to file objections. (ECF No. 23 46.) Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1 1 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 39) filed January 29, 2013, 2 are ADOPTED IN FULL. 3 A. Accordingly, Defendants’ July 23, 2012, Motion to Dismiss (ECF 4 No. 28) is GRANTED to the following extent: Plaintiff’s claims 5 against all remaining defendants are limited to the period of time 6 between April 13, 2006 and October 25, 2006; and 7 B. DENIED in all other respects. 8 Date: March 27, 2013 9 10 11 __________________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?