Chan v. County of Sacramento et al
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/27/10 ORDERING that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed 7/8/10, 42 , is affirmed. (Becknal, R)
(PC) Chan v. County of Sacramento et al
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE vs. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. / On July 21, 2010, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed July 8, 2010, denying plaintiff's motions for sanctions. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed July 8, 2010, (Docket No. 42), is affirmed. Dated: July 27, 2010 ORDER MADY CHAN, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-2006 MCE GGH P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?