United States of America v. Coker

Filing 28

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/30/10 GRANTING 23 Motion for Discovery. (Williams, D) Within fifteen days after the assigned district judge issues any order that denies defendants pending motion to dismiss, defendant shall submit to deposition in the Office of the United States Attorney in North Carolina and shall serve responses without objection to plaintiffs written discovery.

Download PDF
United States of America v. Coker Doc. 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 v. ROBBIN M. COKER, Defendant. / This case came before the court on July 30, 2010, for hearing on plaintiff's motion to compel defendant's appearance at deposition and her responses to plaintiff's first set of interrogatories, first request for production of documents, and first set of requests for admissions. Kurt Alexander Didier, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appeared for plaintiff. Robert Earl McCann, Esq., appeared for defendant. Upon consideration of the parties' Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement and their arguments in open court, and for the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, plaintiff's July 9, 2010 motion to compel (Doc. No. 23) is granted in its entirety. Within fifteen days after the assigned district judge issues any order that denies defendant's pending motion to dismiss, defendant shall submit to deposition in the Office of the ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-2012 JAM DAD ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 United States Attorney in North Carolina and shall serve responses without objection to plaintiff's written discovery. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 30, 2010. DAD:kw Ddad1/orders.civil/USvCoker2012.oah.073010 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?