Combsm et al., v. Stryker Corp, et al.,

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/28/09 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' Third Claim for Relief for Breach of Warranty as to only Defendants Stryker, is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice.(Becknal, R)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD, LLP Ralph A. Campillo, CA Bar No. 70376 Email: [e-mail] Arameh Zargham, CA Bar No. 239495 Email: [e-mail] 801 S. Figueroa Street, 19th Floor Los Angeles, California 900117-5556 Phone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] SEDGWICK DETERT MORAN & ARNOLD, LLP Wayne Wolff, Esq., CA Bar No. 161351 Email: [e-mail] One Market Plaza Steuart Tower, 8th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Phone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants STRYKER CORPORATION and STRYKER SALES CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ SACRAMENTO DIVISION JULIE M. COMBS and STEVEN COMBS Plaintiffs, v. STRYKER CORPORATION, a Michigan Corporation; STRYKER SALES CORPORATION, a Michigan Corporation; MCKINLEY MEDICAL, L.L.C., a Colorado Corporation; MOOG, INC., a New York Corporation; ASTRAZENECA PLC, a United Kingdom Corporation; ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, a Delaware Corporation; ASTRAZENECA LP, a Delaware Corporation; and ZENECA CASE NO. 2:09-cv-02018-JAM-GGH
[Assigned to the Honorable John A. Mendez]

ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF AS TO DEFENDANTS STRYKER CORPORATION AND STRYKER SALES CORPORATION

-1-

CASE NO. 2:09-CV-02018-JAM-GGH

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF AS TO DEFENDANTS STRYKER CORPORATION AND STRYKER SALES CORPORATION

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, Defendants. In consideration of the Stipulation entered into between counsel for Plaintiffs Julie M. Combs and Steven Combs, and defendants Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation (collectively "Stryker"), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Third Claim for Relief for Breach of Warranty as to only Defendants Stryker, is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. IT SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 28, 2009 /s/ John A. Mendez__________

Honorable John A. Mendez

-2-

CASE NO. 2:09-CV-02018-JAM-GGH

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF AS TO DEFENDANTS STRYKER CORPORATION AND STRYKER SALES CORPORATION

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (Combs v. Stryker Corp., et al., CASE NO. 2:09-cv-02018-JAM-GGH) I hereby certify that I served the foregoing [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF AS TO DEFENDANTS STRYKER CORPORATION AND STRYKER SALES CORPORATION on the following attorneys on the date noted below via the following method: Method: US Mail, postage prepaid Facsimile Hand Delivery x Overnight Delivery Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorney for Plaintiffs Julie Combs and Steven Combs

David E. Smith KERSHAW, CUTTER & RATINOFF, LLP 401 Watt Avenue Sacramento, California 95864 [e-mail] DATED: this 24th day of August, 2009

SEDGWICK DETERT MORAN & ARNOLD, LLP

BY:

Jeanine Johnson

-3-

CASE NO. 2:09-CV-02018-JAM-GGH

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF AS TO DEFENDANTS STRYKER CORPORATION AND STRYKER SALES CORPORATION

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com