Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. Porter et al

Filing 30

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/10/10 ORDERING that either one or both of the parties shall explain the following issues: 1) Why the 12/9/10 proposed judgment in interpleader is sought under FRCP 54(b); 2) Why the court should ente r a partial judgment; and 3) Whether the proposed order accounts for the registry fund fee assessed under LR 150(i), and if not, why; 4) What issues and parties will remain in this case should a partial judgment be entered as requested. This explanation shall be filed no later than 12/20/10 at 4:00 PM. (Owen, K)

Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. Porter et al

Doc. 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties or a party shall explain in a writing to be filed no later than 4:00 p.m. on December 20, 2010: 1) Why the proposed judgment in interpleader filed on v. BRIAN R. PORTER; CHARLES W. NICHOLS, as Co-Trustee of the LeAnn P. Porter Revokable Living Trust; BETTY JANE NICHOLS, as Co-Trustee of the LeAnn P. Porter Revokable Living Trust, Defendants. ________________________________ CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:09-cv-02058-GEB-KJN ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

December 9, 2010 seeking a partial judgment is sought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b); 2) 3) Why the court should enter a partial judgment; and Whether the proposed order accounts for the registry fund

fee assessed under Local Rule 150(i), and if not, why not; /// ///

1
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated:

4)

What issues and parties will remain in this case should

a partial judgment be entered as requested. IT IS SO ORDERED. December 10, 2010

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

2