Victoria v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/20/09 ORDERING that upon review and consideration of the case, the court determines that this interest presents no conflict in the fair adjudication of the case and that recusal is not necessary. (Becknal, R)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK; WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive. Defendants. / It has come to the court's attention that the court has opened a minimal account for his daughter with Washington Mutual Bank. Upon review and consideration of the case, the court determines that this interest presents no conflict in the fair adjudication of the case and that recusal is not necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 20, 2009. ORDER FRANCISCO VICTORIA, NO. CIV. S-09-2059 LKK/KJM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
