North American Specialty Insurance Company v. Campbell et al

Filing 55

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 05/05/10. The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order in effect is modified to require each party to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(c)(i)s initial expert witness disclo sure Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 6/30/2010. Any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure authorized under Rule 26(a)(2)(c)(ii) on or before July 30, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the other provisions of the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order not being modified herein remain in full force and effect. (Williams, D) Modified on 5/6/2010 (Williams, D).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley 9 10
A Professional Corporation Redwood City

ENRIQUE MARINEZ (SBN 160956) ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY 1001 Marshall Street, Suite 300 Redwood City, CA 94063-2052 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, the parties' initial expert witness disclosures, pursuant to the Court's Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order (Dckt. No. 21) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 26(a)(2)(c)(i) are due on or before April 30, 2010. WHEREAS, Plaintiff NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY ("NASIC") has filed a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment against Defendants Joseph Campbell and JC Show Horses, LLC, for which the Hon. Edmund F. Brennan has taken NASIC's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment under submission and the parties await a ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment.
RC1/5565100.1/TC3

NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH C. CAMPBELL, individually and also known as JOE CAMPBELL, and JOSEPH CHARLES CAMPBELL, and d/b/a JC SHOW HORSES; JC SHOW HORSES, LLC; and DEBORAH SAUERS, individually. Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:09-CV-02061-GEB-EFB STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE PARTIES' TIME TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESSES PURSUANT TO FRCP RULE 26(a)(2)(c)(i)

-1-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE PARTIES' TIME TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESSES

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley 9 10
A Professional Corporation Redwood City

WHEREAS, receipt of Magistrate Judge Brennan's Order on Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants Joseph Campbell and JC Show Horses, LLC may have the effect of narrowing the issues to be litigated in this matter. WHEREAS, the parties do not seek to alter any dates previously set by the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order except for those dates within which the parties are to comply with initial expert witness disclosures. (Dckt. No. 21) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, Plaintiff NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, and Defendant DEBORAH SAUERS, through their respective attorneys of record, Enrique Marinez of Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley and Patrick H. LePley, LePley Law Firm, that the date for initial expert witness disclosure compliance be continued from April 30, 2010, to June 30, 2010, and any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosures occurring on or before July 30, 2010. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: April _____, 2010 ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

By: ENRIQUE MARINEZ Attorneys for Plaintiff NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Dated: April _____, 2010

LEPLEY LAW FIRM

By: PATRICK H. LEPLEY Attorneys for Defendant DEBORAH SAUERS ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order in effect is modified to require each party to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(c)(i)'s initial expert witness disclosure
RC1/5565100.1/TC3

-2-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE PARTIES' TIME TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESSES

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley 9 10
A Professional Corporation Redwood City

requirements on or before June 30, 2010, and any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure authorized under Rule 26(a)(2)(c)(ii) on or before July 30, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the other provisions of the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order not modified herein remain in full force and effect. Dated: 5/5/10 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
RC1/5565100.1/TC3

-3-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE PARTIES' TIME TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESSES