Johnson v. Shahryar Sefidpour D.D.S., M.S.D., Inc. et al

Filing 24

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 11/16/09 ORDERING that defendants Mark O'Brien and Timothy F. O'Brien are hereby dismissed WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(2). This case is to be remained open with remaining Defendants. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 PMB #253 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 FAX (916) 481-4224 E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: CIV.S.09-02088 FCD EFB STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF MARK O'BRIEN; TIMOTHY F. O'BRIEN; ORDER SCOTT N. JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. SHAHRYAR SEFIDPOUR D.D.S., M.S.D., INC., et. al., Defendants. Complaint Filed: JULY 29, 2009 CASE TO BE REMAINED OPEN WITH REMAINING DEFENDANTS IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiff, Scott N. Johnson, that Defendants (Mark O'Brien; Timothy F. O'Brien) be and are hereby dismissed WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(2). This case is to be remained open with remaining Defendants. Defendants (Mark O'Brien; Timothy F. O'Brien) are dismissed because Plaintiff and these Defendants have settled their dispute. Dated: November 11, 2009 /s/Scott N. Johnson____________ SCOTT N. JOHNSON Attorney for Plaintiff 1 STIPULATED DISMISSAL; ORDER CIV: S-09-02088-FCD-EFB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 12, 2009 /s/Kenneth R. Stone____________ KENNETH R. STONE Attorney for Defendants, MARK O'BRIEN; TIMOTHY F. O'BRIEN IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 16, 2009 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 STIPULATED DISMISSAL; ORDER CIV: S-09-02088-FCD-EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?