Johnson v. Martel et al

Filing 26

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/23/2010 ORDERING that pltf's 20 motion for TRO be reassigned to case number 2:10-cv-0282 KJM. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. M. MARTEL, et al., Defendants. / ORDER JOSEPH JOHNSON, Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-2103 JFM (PC) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Defendants have neither consented nor declined to proceed before the undersigned despite order to do so by December 15, 2009. (Doc. No. 16.) On February 10, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion for temporary restraining order. Although plaintiff labeled this document with the case number for this matter, none of the defendants listed on the motion are involved in this action. It appears plaintiff, who has two section 1983 cases pending in this court, has mislabeled the case number. ///// ///// ///// 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's February 10, 2010 motion for temporary restraining order be reassigned to case number 2:10-cv-0282-KJM. DATED: February 23, 2010. /014; john2031.inj(2) 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOSEPH JOHNSON, Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-2103 JFM (PC) vs. M. MARTEL, et al., NOTICE OF SUBMISSION Defendants. OF DOCUMENTS ____________________________________/ Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's order filed : completed summons form completed USM-285 forms copies of the Complaint DATED:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?