Johnson v. Martel et al
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 11/2/2010 GRANTING dfts Bishop and Kudlata's 49 request to modify the scheduling order; dfts 10/27/10 motion for summary judgment is DEEMED TIMELY. (Yin, K)
<![CDATA[
(PC) Johnson v. Martel et al
Doc. 52
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1
Dockets.Justia.com
/014.john2103.dso.mod
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOSEPH JOHNSON, Plaintiff, vs. G. BISHOP, et al., Defendants. / Upon examination of the moving papers, and good cause appearing, defendants Bishop and Kudlata's request to modify the scheduling order extending the dispositive motion deadline by twenty-days is GRANTED. Defendants motion for summary judgment, filed and served on October 27, 2010, is deemed timely. The time for plaintiff to file an opposition shall run from the date the defendants' motion was properly served on him. DATED: November 2, 2010. ORDER No. 2:09-cv-2103 JFM (PC)
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
