Johnson v. Martel et al

Filing 57

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/30/11 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 5/3/11 55 are ADOPTED in full; Defendants' 10/27/10 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 51 is GRANTED; Defendants' 10/08/10 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 48 is DENIED as moot; This Action is CLOSED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

JOSEPH JOHNSON,

11

Plaintiff,

12

vs.

13

No. 2:09-cv-2103 JAM JFM (PC)

G. BISHOP, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15
16

ORDER
/

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

17

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

18

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

19

On May 3, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

20

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

21

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed

22

objections to the findings and recommendations.

23

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule

24

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

25

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

26

proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 3, 2011, are adopted in full;

3

2. Defendants’ October 27, 2010 motion for summary judgment is granted;

4

3. Defendants’ October 8, 2010 motion for summary judgment is denied as moot;

5
6
7

and
4. This action is closed.
DATED: June 30, 2011

8
/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2