Bontemps v. Sotak et al
Filing
125
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 09/01/18 ADOPTING 121 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING 117 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GREGORY C. BONTEMPS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:09-cv-2115-MCE-EFB P
v.
ORDER
SOTAK et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 18, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 121. Plaintiff has
23
filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 122.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire
26
file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
27
proper analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 18, 2018, ECF No. 121, are ADOPTED
3
IN FULL; and
4
2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 117) is DENIED.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: September 1, 2018
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?