Bontemps v. Sotak et al

Filing 41

ORDER ADOPTING 25 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/16/12. Defendants Cannon, Tidwell and Slayball are DISMISSED without prejudice. (Manzer, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

GREGORY C. BONTEMPS,
Plaintiff,

11
vs.

12
13

No. CIV S-09-2115 LKK EFB P

SOTAK, et al.,
Defendants.

14

ORDER
/

15

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

16
17

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

18

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On January 4, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

19
20

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

21

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not

22

filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

23
24

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

25

ORDERED that:

26

////
1

1
2
3

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 4, 2012, are adopted in full;
and
2. Defendants Cannon, Tidwell, and Slayball are dismissed without prejudice

4

due to plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

5

DATED: April 16, 2012.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2