Hoey v. New York Life Insurance Company et al

Filing 35

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/6/11 ORDERING the Hearing on the 14 Motion for Summary Judgment is CONTINUED to 6/6/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton.(Donati, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

KAREN ASPLUND VELEZ, State Bar No. 142287
MARK P. VELEZ, State Bar No. 163484
THE VELEZ LAW FIRM
6940 Destiny Drive
Rocklin, CA 95677
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff BARBARA HOEY
MELINDA S. RIECHERT, State Bar No. 65504
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
2 Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2122
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
SHANNON NAKABAYASHI, State Bar No. 215469
KATHRYN M. DANCISAK, State Bar No. 259392
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. INC. and NEW YORK
LIFE INSURANCE & ANNUITY CORPORATION

18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20
21
22

BARBARA HOEY,

25
26
27

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE HEARING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff,

23
24

Case No. 2:09-CV-02116-LKK-GGH

vs.
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO.
INC., a New York Corporation and NEW
YORK LIFE INSURANCE & ANNUITY
CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation,

Current Date: May 9, 2011
Proposed Date: June 6, 2011

Defendants.

28

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO

1

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONT.
HRG ON MTN FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 2:09-CV-02116-LKK-GGH

1

Plaintiff Barbara Hoey (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants New York Life Insurance Co. Inc.

2

and New York Life Insurance & Annuity Corp. (“Defendants”), by and through their respective

3

counsel, jointly stipulate to continue the hearing date for Defendants’ Motion for Summary

4

Judgment, or in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment, from May 9, 2011 to June 6, 2011 as

5

follows:

6
7

JOINT STIPULATION

8
9

Whereas, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Partial
Summary Judgment on April 11, 2011;

10
11

Whereas, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the
Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment is scheduled for May 9, 2011;

12

Whereas, Plaintiff’s counsel is not available to attend the hearing on May 9, 2011 because

13

Plaintiff has commenced a trial in Sacramento County Superior Court in the matter entitled

14

Beauchamp v. Teamsters Local 150, Case No. 34-2009-00060500, in Department 45 before the

15

Honorable Judy Hersher; and that Judge Hersher has ordered Plaintiff’s counsel to remain in the

16

trial;

17

Accordingly, Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their counsel of record, hereby

18

stipulate to, and request the Court’s approval of, continuing the date for the hearing on the

19

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment

20

from May 9, 2011 to June 6, 2011.

21

///

22

///

23

///

24
25
26
27
28

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO

2

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONT.
HRG ON MTN FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 2:09-CV-02116-LKK-GGH

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2
3

Dated: May 6, 2011

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

4

By

5
6
7
8

Dated: May 6, 2011

/s/ Melinda S. Riechert
Melinda S. Riechert
Attorneys for Defendants
NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO. INC. and
NEW YORK LIFE INS. & ANNUITY
CORPORATION

THE VELEZ LAW FIRM

9

By

10
11

/s/ Mark P. Velez
Mark P. Velez
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BARBARA HOEY

12
13
14

[PROPOSED] ORDER
In light of the Parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, the hearing on Defendants’

15

Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment is hereby

16

continued from May 9, 2011 to June 6, 2011 at 10:00 a.m.

17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20

Dated: May 6, 2011

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO

3

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONT.
HRG ON MTN FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 2:09-CV-02116-LKK-GGH