Noble et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/6/2009 ORDERING the hearing of dft's 8/25/2009 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 5) is continued to 11/6/2009, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 27 before the undersigned; Pltfs' written opposition to dft's motion shall be filed with the court and served on dft's attorney of record on or before 10/23/2009; Dft's reply to pltfs' opposition shall be filed and served on or before 10/30/2009; and Pltfs' 10/1/2009 motion (Doc. No. 11) for continuance of the hearing to 10/23/2009 is denied. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, 14 Defendant. 15 / 16 This matter came before the court on October 2, 2009 for hearing of defendant's 17 motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint. Attorney Constance S. Trinh appeared telephonically for 18 the defendant. The plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, appeared in propria persona. 19 For the reasons stated in open court, IT IS ORDERED that: 20 1. The hearing of defendant's August 25, 2009 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 5) is 21 continued to November 6, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 27 before the undersigned; 22 2. Plaintiffs' written opposition to defendant's motion shall be filed with the 23 court and served on defendant's attorney of record on or before October 23, 2009; 24 3. Defendant's reply to plaintiffs' opposition shall be filed and served on or 25 before October 30, 2009; and 26 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRANK NOBLE JR. and BRENDA D. NOBLE, No. CIV S-09-2168 MCE DAD PS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DAD:kw 4. Plaintiffs' October 1, 2009 motion (Doc. No. 11) for continuance of the hearing to October 23, 2009 is denied. DATED: October 6, 2009. DDad1\orders.prose\noble2168.oah100209.con 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?