Noble et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/13/09 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' notice of voluntary dismissal 15 shall be honored pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i). This Action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Defendant's 8/25/09 MOTION TO DISMISS 5 is MOOT, and the hearing set for 11/06/09 is VACATED. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Plaintiffs, 12 vs. 13 OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se with this action, have withdrawn their opposition to dismissal and have requested dismissal of the case. After removing the action from state court on August 5, 2009, defendant filed a motion to dismiss. The motion was heard by the undersigned on October 2, 2009, and the hearing was continued to November 6, 2009, to allow plaintiffs additional time to file written opposition to defendant's motion. However, on October 6, 2009, plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. Defendant has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment. In the absence of an answer or a summary judgment motion, plaintiffs are entitled to voluntarily dismiss their action. ///// ///// 1 ORDER No. CIV S-09-2168 MCE DAD PS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRANK NOBLE JR. and BRENDA D. NOBLE, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DAD:kw Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs' notice of voluntary dismissal (Doc. No. 15) shall be honored pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). 2. This action shall be dismissed without prejudice. 3. Defendant's August 25, 2009 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 5) is moot, and the hearing set for November 6, 2009, is vacated. 4. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. DATED: October 13, 2009. Ddad1\orders.prose\noble2168.voldism 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?