Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC, et al., v. Singh,

Filing 28

JUDGMENT dated *10/12/10* in favor of Baskin-Robbins against Reena Singh signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/8/10. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Judith B. Gitterman, Bar No. 115661 [e-mail] Gabriel Liao, Bar No. 205897 [e-mail] Monica M. Ortiz [e-mail] PERKINS COIE LLP 1888 Century Park East, Suite 1700 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 310.788.3399 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC, BR IP Holder LLC and DB Real Estate Assets I, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISING LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; BR IP HOLDER LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and DB REAL ESTATE ASSETS I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiffs, v. REENA SINGH, an individual, and HARDEEP SINGH, an individual, Defendants.

Case No. 2:09-CV-02172-JAM-DAD JUDGMENT FED. R. CIV. P. 58 Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT Case No. 2:09-CV-02172-JAM-DAD

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

28028-4534.0001/LEGAL19023946.3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The Court has reviewed the stipulation of Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC, BR IP Holder LLC and DB Real Estate Assets I, LLC (collectively "Baskin-Robbins") and Defendants Reena Singh and Hardeep Singh (collectively "Defendants"), through which the parties agreed to voluntary dismiss all claims, except the Fourth Claim, against Defendant Reena Singh and all claims against Defendant Hardeep Singh. There are no other claims brought by or against Baskin-Robbins remaining for adjudication before this Court and good cause appearing, the Court expressly determines that there in no just reason for delay in entering judgment in favor of Baskin-Robbins against Defendant Reena Singh. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. The Court accepts the parties' joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Defendant Hardeep

Singh From Action and Defendant Reena Singh as to the First, Second, Third, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Causes of Action. 2. Judgment be entered against Defendant Reena Singh and in favor of Baskin-

Robbins on the Fourth Claim for Breach of Contract. 3. Pursuant to the Court's July 7, 2010 Order, attached hereto as Exhibit A, Baskin-

Robbins is hereby awarded judgment against Defendant Reena Singh in the amount of $124,551.17, plus interest at the maximum legal rate. 4. Baskin-Robbins shall recover from Defendant Reena Singh costs of suit and

attorneys' fees in this proceeding pursuant to law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that entry of the judgment rendered against Defendant Reena Singh in favor of Baskin-Robbins will not affect the right of Crossclaimant Reena Singh to pursue her Cross-claim against Cross-defendant Hardeep Singh.

Dated: October 8, 2010 /s/ John A. Mendez_______ Honorable John A. Mendez

-2[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT Case No. 2:09-CV-02172-JAM-DAD

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

28028-4534.0001/LEGAL19023946.3