Gilmore et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al.,

Filing 117

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/22/2010 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' 75 motion to compel further responses to their Requests for Production of Documents, Sets 3 and 4 is GRANTED as those requests were limited on the record in open court; defendant's further responses (including any response stating that the requested documents have previously been produced pursuant to other requests) shall be served within 21 days after the date on which this order is filed. Plaintiff Dana Gilmore's 77 motion to compel further responses to her Request for Admissions and corresponding Interrogatories is DENIED without prejudice. The requests for sanctions included in both 75 77 motions are DENIED.(Duong, D)

Gilmore et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al.,

Doc. 117

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / This case came before the court on November 19, 2010, for hearing on plaintiffs' motion to compel further responses to Requests for Production of Documents, Sets 3 and 4, and request for sanctions (Doc. No. 75) and plaintiff Dana Gilmore's motion to compel further responses to Request for Admissions and corresponding Interrogatories, and request for sanctions (Doc. No. 77). Larry Lockshin, Esq. appeared for plaintiffs. Naisha Covarrubias, Esq. appeared for defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. The parties' Joint Discovery Stipulations were considered, along with their arguments at the hearing. For the reasons set forth in great detail on the record, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs' motion to compel further responses to their Requests for Production of Documents, Sets 3 and 4 (Doc. No. 75) is granted as those requests were limited on the record 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JEREMY GILMORE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, et al., ORDER No. CIV S-09-02180 JAM DAD

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

in open court; defendant's further responses (including any response stating that the requested documents have previously been produced pursuant to other requests) shall be served within 21 days after the date on which this order is filed; 2. Plaintiff Dana Gilmore's motion to compel further responses to her Request for Admissions and corresponding Interrogatories (Doc. No. 77) is denied without prejudice; and 3. The requests for sanctions included in both motions (Doc. Nos. 75 and 77) are denied. DATED: November 22, 2010.

DAD:kw Ddad1\orders.civil\gilmore2180.oah.111910

2