Gilmore et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al.,

Filing 133

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/3/10, ORDERING that 90 pltf's motion for leave to propound more than 25 interrogatories is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
Gilmore et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al., Doc. 133 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DAD:kw Ddad1\orders.civil\gilmore2180.oah.120310 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JEREMY GILMORE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, et al., ORDER / This case came before the court on December 3, 2010, for hearing on plaintiffs' motion for leave to propound more than the 25 interrogatories authorized under Rule 33(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Larry Lockshin, Esq. appeared for plaintiffs. Naisha Covarrubias, Esq. appeared for defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. The parties' Joint Discovery Stipulation Regarding Additional Interrogatories (Doc. No. 120) was considered, along with the parties' arguments at the hearing. For the reasons set forth in great detail on the record, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for leave to propound more than 25 interrogatories (Doc. No. 90) is denied. DATED: December 3, 2010. No. CIV S-09-02180 JAM DAD Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?